本文由今日直播网世界杯直播频道整理发布，更多资讯请关注本站。
和18年g1一律，固然是詹姆斯抨击犯禁，然而裁判仍旧判了如何还不妨看录像，即日也是都判给湖人了，如何还能看录像，湖人够惨了还黑哨
18不是先判遏制后判抨击犯禁的吗？
蚌埠住了~
18不是先判遏制后判抨击犯禁的吗？
又来了，2022年再有人感触18有题目嘿嘿径直上原文准则since the 2012-13 season, referees have reviewed all block/charge calls when they are not reasonably certain as to whether the defender was inside or outside of the restricted area. for more information about what constitutes a block or a charge, click here). restricted area replays are conducted only during the last two minutes of the fourth period and during all of overtime.when conducting their review, referees attempt to confirm or overturn their original call.the call is deemed a block if referees deem the defender was:not in a legal guarding position, orin a legal guarding position, but inside the restricted areathe call is deemed a charge if the defender was in a legal guarding position and outside the restricted area.referees also determine if any unsportsmanlike acts or unnecessary contact occurred.这内里径直说了四种情景不妨看回放并改判，个中有确认能否站在精确防止场所的，其时裁判没搞清是否站在正当的防止场所以是启用了回放体制，而后谁人真实是个遏制犯禁，以是举行了overturn，有什么题目 ？
蚌埠住了~
哭了
18不是先判遏制后判抨击犯禁的吗？
对啊如何不妨改判 明显仍旧得利了 为啥还玩这一套
懂了，提出挑拨准则的人该当被撤职
懂了，提出挑拨准则的人该当被撤职
然而咱们詹蜜都很不平，18年g1 假如不矫正错判，jr不是笨蛋就赢了
又来了，2022年再有人感触18有题目嘿嘿径直上原文准则since the 2012-13 season, referees have reviewed all block/charge calls when they are not reasonably certain as to whether the defender was inside or outside of the restricted area. for more information about what constitutes a block or a charge, click here). restricted area replays are conducted only during the last two minutes of the fourth period and during all of overtime.when conducting their review, referees attempt to confirm or overturn their original call.the call is deemed a block if referees deem the defender was:not in a legal guarding position, orin a legal guarding position, but inside the restricted areathe call is deemed a charge if the defender was in a legal guarding position and outside the restricted area.referees also determine if any unsportsmanlike acts or unnecessary contact occurred.这内里径直说了四种情景不妨看回放并改判，个中有确认能否站在精确防止场所的，其时裁判没搞清是否站在正当的防止场所以是启用了回放体制，而后谁人真实是个遏制犯禁，以是举行了overturn，有什么题目 ？
有理有据 然而身为詹蜜仍旧不平
18不是先判遏制后判抨击犯禁的吗？
18年是底线裁判判遏制，边线裁判判抨击犯禁
